Net versus combinatory effects of firm and industry antecedents of sales growth

This study examines antecedents of sales growth using a two-step mixed-method approach including analyses of net effects and combinatory effects. Based on a sample of 453 respondents from manufacturing and service firms, this article shows how the combination of structural equation modeling (SEM) and fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) provides more detailed insights into the causal patterns of factors to explain sales growth. This article contributes to the extant literature by highlighting fsQCA as a useful method to analyze complex causality (specifically combinatory effects of antecedent conditions) and by discussing options regarding how this approach can be used to complement findings from conventional causal data analysis procedures that analyze net effects

Investigating total entrepreneurial activity and entrepreneurial intention in Africa regions using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA)

This study offers a novel evaluation of the conditions for Total Entrepreneurial Activity (TEA) and Entrepreneurial Intention (EI) across 59 Sub-Saharan African regions. The analysis employs fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis using Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (2013) survey data using five condition variables, measuring regional-level entrepreneurial attitudes and perceptions, including education level, considered against TEA and EI. This novel regional contribution identifies diversity between African countries and regions for entrepreneurial activities and its drivers, with several groups identified. This highlights a requirement for future research encompassing further countries and regions in African, and also multi-year studies that can track these issues longitudinally. The study informs knowledge and practice regarding entrepreneurial behaviour across African regions. Through examination of the different combinations of condition variables, across causal recipes, it provides understanding of variations in the socio-cultural drivers of entrepreneurial activity between regions, groups of regions, and countries, for TEA and EI

MAKING COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS COUNT

Often, when social scientists hear the phrase general knowledge they immediately start thinking in terms of relationships between abstract concepts represented in terms of variables. They have been trained to equate general knowledgewith discourse about relationships between variables. For example, a social scientistmight observe that the most economically advanced countries are also stabledemocracies and from this observation posit that there is a general relationship betweendevelopment and democracy. Thus, he or she might state, in general knowledge terms,that "economic development furthers democratic stability, as seen in the correlationbetween the variables democracy and development." In this paper, I argue that generalknowledge can come in other forms and that it is not dependent on a discourse groundedin correlations between variables

Taming the snake in paradise: combining institutional design and leadership to enhance collaborative innovation

The growing expectations to public services and the pervasiveness of wicked problems in times characterized by growing fiscal constraints call for the enhancement of public innovation, and new research suggests that multi-actor collaboration in networks and partnerships is superior to hierarchical and market-based strategies when it comes to spurring such innovation. Collaborative innovation seems ideal as it builds on diversity to generate innovative public value outcomes, but there is a catch since diversity may clash with the need for constructing a common ground that allows participating actors to agree on a joint and innovative solution. The challenge for collaborative innovation – taming the snake in paradise – is to nurture the diversity of views, ideas and forms of knowledge while still establishing a common ground for joint learning. While we know a great deal about the dynamics of the mutually supportive processes of collaboration, learning and innovation, we have yet to understand the role of institutional design and leadership in spurring collaborative innovation and dealing with this tension. Building on extant research, the article draws suitable cases from the Collaborative Governance Data Bank and uses Qualitative Comparative Analysis to explore how multiple constellations of institutional design and leadership spur collaborative innovation. The main finding is that, even though certain institutional design features reduce the need for certain leadership roles, the exercise of hands-on leadership is more important for securing collaborative innovation outcomes than hands-off institutional design

Life below excellence: exploring the links between top-ranked universities and regional competitiveness

[EN] This paper examines interactions between the presence of top-ranked universities and other conditions that encourage regional competitiveness. Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) was conducted to assess the combined effect of the conditions. The analysis yields several noteworthy conclusions. First, no single condition is necessary for a region to be competitive. Second, R&D expenditure is important for regional competitiveness. Third, different configurations of conditions are sufficient for high competitiveness in different regional clusters. Furthermore, some of these configurations do not include the presence of top-ranked universities. A 'magic recipe' consists of the combination of a private research system, an inter-firm collaboration network and high levels of human capital. The analysis shows that university excellence is valuable. However, in terms of its contribution to regional development, it is not crucial and must always be contextualised. This conclusion is important for smart strategic planning of local knowledge systems.Jose-Maria Garcia-Alvarez-Coque and Francisco Mas-Verdu wish to thank Project RTI2018-093791-B-C22, funded by the Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (Spain), for supporting this research.García Alvarez-Coque, JM.; Mas Verdú, F.; Roig Tierno, H. (2021). Life below excellence: exploring the links between top-ranked universities and regional competitiveness. Studies in Higher Education. 46(2):369-384. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1637843S369384462Alamá-Sabater, L., Budí, V., García-Álvarez-Coque, J. M., & Roig-Tierno, N. (2019). Using mixed research approaches to understand rural depopulation. Economía Agraria y Recursos Naturales, 19(1), 99. doi:10.7201/earn.2019.01.06Baldacci, E., Clements, B., Gupta, S., & Cui, Q. (2008). Social Spending, Human Capital, and Growth in Developing Countries. World Development, 36(8), 1317-1341. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.08.003Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2004). Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1), 31-56. doi:10.1191/0309132504ph469oaBaumann, C., & Winzar, H. (2014). The role of secondary education in explaining competitiveness. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 36(1), 13-30. doi:10.1080/02188791.2014.924387Berger, E. S. C. (2016). Is Qualitative Comparative Analysis an Emerging Method?—Structured Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis of QCA Applications in Business and Management Research. FGF Studies in Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 287-308. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-27108-8_14Bjerke, L., & Johansson, S. (2015). Patterns of innovation and collaboration in small and large firms. The Annals of Regional Science, 55(1), 221-247. doi:10.1007/s00168-015-0712-yBoucher, G., Conway, C., & Van Der Meer, E. (2003). Tiers of Engagement by Universities in their Region’s Development. Regional Studies, 37(9), 887-897. doi:10.1080/0034340032000143896Bramwell, A., & Wolfe, D. A. (2008). Universities and regional economic development: The entrepreneurial University of Waterloo. Research Policy, 37(8), 1175-1187. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.016Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2009). Mobility of skilled workers and co-invention networks: an anatomy of localized knowledge flows. Journal of Economic Geography, 9(4), 439-468. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbp008Camagni, R. (2017). Regional Competitiveness: Towards a Concept of Territorial Capital. Seminal Studies in Regional and Urban Economics, 115-131. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-57807-1_6Camagni, R., & Capello, R. (2013). Regional Competitiveness and Territorial Capital: A Conceptual Approach and Empirical Evidence from the European Union. Regional Studies, 47(9), 1383-1402. doi:10.1080/00343404.2012.681640Choi, J., & Lee, J. (2017). Repairing the R&D market failure: Public R&D subsidy and the composition of private R&D. Research Policy, 46(8), 1465-1478. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.06.009Cowan, R. (2000). The explicit economics of knowledge codification and tacitness. Industrial and Corporate Change, 9(2), 211-253. doi:10.1093/icc/9.2.211Cowan, R., & Zinovyeva, N. (2013). University effects on regional innovation. Research Policy, 42(3), 788-800. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.10.001Crilly, D. (2010). Predicting stakeholder orientation in the multinational enterprise: A mid-range theory. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(5), 694-717. doi:10.1057/jibs.2010.57Domenech, J., Escamilla, R., & Roig-Tierno, N. (2016). Explaining knowledge-intensive activities from a regional perspective. Journal of Business Research, 69(4), 1301-1306. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.096Duşa, A. (2008). A mathematical approach to the boolean minimization problem. Quality & Quantity, 44(1), 99-113. doi:10.1007/s11135-008-9183-xDuvivier, C., Polèse, M., & Apparicio, P. (2017). The location of information technology-led new economy jobs in cities: office parks or cool neighbourhoods? Regional Studies, 52(6), 756-767. doi:10.1080/00343404.2017.1322686European Commission. 2016a. European Regional Competitiveness Index. Brussels: Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy. Accessed June 2018. https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/information/maps/regional_competitiveness/.European Commission. 2016b. Regional Innovation Scoreboard (RIS). Brussels: Publications Office of the EU. Accessed June 2018. https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/693eaaba-de16-11e6-ad7c-01aa75ed71a1/language-en/format-PDF/source-31233711.Fan, D., Li, Y., & Chen, L. (2017). Configuring innovative societies: The crossvergent role of cultural and institutional varieties. Technovation, 66-67, 43-56. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2017.05.003Fiss, P. C. (2011). Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393-420. doi:10.5465/amj.2011.60263120Garcia-Alvarez-Coque, J.-M., Mas-Verdu, F., & Sanchez García, M. (2014). Determinants of Agri-food Firms’ Participation in Public Funded Research and Development. Agribusiness, 31(3), 314-329. doi:10.1002/agr.21407García Álvarez-Coque, J. M., Mas-Verdú, F., & Roig-Tierno, N. (2016). Technological innovation versus non-technological innovation: different conditions in different regional contexts? Quality & Quantity, 51(5), 1955-1967. doi:10.1007/s11135-016-0394-2Grossman, J. H., Reid, P. P., & Morgan, R. P. (2001). The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1/2), 143-152. doi:10.1023/a:1007848631448Harrison, R. T., & Leitch, C. M. (2005). Entrepreneurial Learning: Researching the Interface between Learning and the Entrepreneurial Context. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(4), 351-371. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00089.xHarrison, J., & Turok, I. (2017). Universities, knowledge and regional development. Regional Studies, 51(7), 977-981. doi:10.1080/00343404.2017.1328189Hazelkorn, E. (2008). Learning to Live with League Tables and Ranking: The Experience of Institutional Leaders. Higher Education Policy, 21(2), 193-215. doi:10.1057/hep.2008.1Hewitt-Dundas, N., & Roper, S. (2011). Creating advantage in peripheral regions: The role of publicly funded R&D centres. Research Policy, 40(6), 832-841. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.03.005Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., de Rijcke, S., & Rafols, I. (2015). Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature, 520(7548), 429-431. doi:10.1038/520429aJaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 577-598. doi:10.2307/2118401Jaumotte, F., and N. Pain. 2005. “From Ideas to Development: The Determinants of R&D and Patenting.” OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 457, OECD Publishing (NJ1).Kitson, M., Martin, R., & Tyler, P. (2004). Regional Competitiveness: An Elusive yet Key Concept? Regional Studies, 38(9), 991-999. doi:10.1080/0034340042000320816Lasagni, A. (2012). How Can External Relationships Enhance Innovation in SMEs? New Evidence for Europe*. Journal of Small Business Management, 50(2), 310-339. doi:10.1111/j.1540-627x.2012.00355.xLee, S., Park, G., Yoon, B., & Park, J. (2010). Open innovation in SMEs—An intermediated network model. Research Policy, 39(2), 290-300. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2009.12.009Lilles, A., & Rõigas, K. (2015). How higher education institutions contribute to the growth in regions of Europe? Studies in Higher Education, 42(1), 65-78. doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1034264Lim, M. A. (2017). The building of weak expertise: the work of global university rankers. Higher Education, 75(3), 415-430. doi:10.1007/s10734-017-0147-8Mairesse, J., & Mohnen, P. (2010). Using Innovation Surveys for Econometric Analysis. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, 1129-1155. doi:10.1016/s0169-7218(10)02010-1Isabel Maria, B. F., Rossi, F., & Geuna, A. (2013). Collaboration objectives and the location of the university partner: Evidence from the Piedmont region in Italy. Papers in Regional Science, 93, S203-S226. doi:10.1111/pirs.12054Marino, M., Lhuillery, S., Parrotta, P., & Sala, D. (2016). Additionality or crowding-out? An overall evaluation of public R&D subsidy on private R&D expenditure. Research Policy, 45(9), 1715-1730. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2016.04.009Medzihorsky, J., I. Oana, M. Quaranta, and C. Schneider. 2016. “SetMethods: Functions for Set-theoretic Multi-method Research and Advanced QCA.” R package version 2.1.Miozzo, M., Desyllas, P., Lee, H., & Miles, I. (2016). Innovation collaboration and appropriability by knowledge-intensive business services firms. Research Policy, 45(7), 1337-1351. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2016.03.018Olcay, G. A., & Bulu, M. (2017). Is measuring the knowledge creation of universities possible?: A review of university rankings. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, 153-160. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.03.029Paruolo, P., Saisana, M., & Saltelli, A. (2012). Ratings and rankings: voodoo or science? Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 176(3), 609-634. doi:10.1111/j.1467-985x.2012.01059.xPinch, S., Henry, N., Jenkins, M., & Tallman, S. (2003). From «industrial districts» to «knowledge clusters»: a model of knowledge dissemination and competitive advantage in industrial agglomerations. Journal of Economic Geography, 3(4), 373-388. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbg019Pinheiro, R., Benneworth, P., & Jones, G. A. (Eds.). (2012). Universities and Regional Development. doi:10.4324/9780203112298Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning Social Inquiry. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226702797.001.0001Ragin, C. C. (2014). The Comparative Method. doi:10.1525/9780520957350Roig-Tierno, N., Gonzalez-Cruz, T. F., & Llopis-Martinez, J. (2017). An overview of qualitative comparative analysis: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 2(1), 15-23. doi:10.1016/j.jik.2016.12.002Schneider, M. R., Schulze-Bentrop, C., & Paunescu, M. (2009). Mapping the institutional capital of high-tech firms: A fuzzy-set analysis of capitalist variety and export performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(2), 246-266. doi:10.1057/jibs.2009.36Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2012). Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences. doi:10.1017/cbo9781139004244SCImago. 2016. Scimago Institutions Ranking. Accessed June 2018. https://www.scimagoir.com.Shapira, P., & Youtie, J. (2008). Learning to Innovate: Building Regional Technology Development Learning Networks in Midsized Cities. European Planning Studies, 16(9), 1207-1228. doi:10.1080/09654310802401631Soete, L., B. Verspagen, and T. Ziesemer. 2017. “The Productivity Effect of Public R&D in the Netherlands (No. 021).” United Nations University-Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).Suri, T., Boozer, M. A., Ranis, G., & Stewart, F. (2011). Paths to Success: The Relationship Between Human Development and Economic Growth. World Development, 39(4), 506-522. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.08.020Thiem, A. (2014). Analyzing multilevel data with QCA: yet another straightforward procedure. Quality & Quantity, 50(1), 121-128. doi:10.1007/s11135-014-0140-6Tobiassen, A. E., & Pettersen, I. B. (2017). Exploring open innovation collaboration between SMEs and larger customers. Baltic Journal of Management, 13(1), 65-83. doi:10.1108/bjm-01-2017-0018Van Raan, A. F. J. (2005). Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods. Scientometrics, 62(1), 133-143. doi:10.1007/s11192-005-0008-6Vis, B. (2012). The Comparative Advantages of fsQCA and Regression Analysis for Moderately Large-N Analyses. Sociological Methods & Research, 41(1), 168-198. doi:10.1177/0049124112442142Wolfe, D. A. (2005). 10. The Role of Universities in Regional Development and Cluster Formation. Creating Knowledge, Strengthening Nations, 167-194. doi:10.3138/9781442673564-013World Bank. (2017). GDP Per Capita in US Dollars. World Bank National Accounts Data, and OECD National Accounts Data Files. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/ny.gdp.pcap.cd.Youtie, J., & Shapira, P. (2008). Building an innovation hub: A case study of the transformation of university roles in regional technological and economic development. Research Policy, 37(8), 1188-1204. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.01